Architecture Decision Records — azurelocal-scom-mp¶
Lightweight, numbered, immutable records of architectural decisions that govern the SCOM Management Pack and Azure Monitor Health Model design for Azure Local.
These are project-scoped ADRs. Org-wide platform standards live in AzureLocal/platform/decisions/.
Index¶
| # | Title | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 0001 | Scope & topology — Azure Local infrastructure (3 layers, ~27 entities) | ✅ Accepted |
| 0002 | Primary signal source — Azure Local PowerShell APIs + ARM/Resource Graph | ✅ Accepted |
| 0003 | Health rollup policy — worst-state default with documented exceptions | ✅ Accepted |
| 0004 | SCOM discovery strategy — PowerShell Discovery (not WMI) | ✅ Accepted |
| 0005 | SCOM class hierarchy + hosting relationships (3-layer model) | ✅ Accepted |
| 0006 | Azure Monitor entity model alignment (mirrors SCOM 1:1) | ✅ Accepted |
| 0007 | Naming convention — cross-track parity | ✅ Accepted |
| 0008 | Customization strategy — sealed MP + override pack tiers; Bicep params + tiers | ✅ Accepted |
| 0009 | Alert vs health-state separation policy | ✅ Accepted |
| 0010 | Cloud-side prerequisites contract (HCI Insights, AMA, DCMA, Service Group, RBAC, networking) | ✅ Accepted |
| 0011 | L3 Azure-side scope: agent-local Arc health checks (Tier A) vs. management server ARM probes (Tier B) | ✅ Accepted |
| 0012 | Azure Monitor Workspace vs Log Analytics Workspace: metrics routing for the health model (dual-topology support) | ✅ Accepted |
| 0013 | Azure Monitor Health Model deployment strategy — Bicep-first, portal-bootstrap | ✅ Accepted |
| 0014 | CI/CD pipeline strategy — GitHub Actions, OIDC, release-please | ✅ Accepted |
| 0015 | Testing strategy — 5-layer pyramid, cross-track parity gate | ✅ Accepted |
| 0016 | Signing & secrets management — two-key MP signing, OIDC SPNs | ✅ Accepted |
| 0017 | Versioning & release policy — single repo SemVer, Conventional Commits, mike docs | ✅ Accepted |
| 0018 | Self-observability — monitor the monitoring pipeline as a parallel root branch | ✅ Accepted |
| 0019 | Cost, scale, and data retention — per-tier ingestion envelopes, sharding, retention policy | ✅ Accepted |
When to write an ADR¶
- Any architectural choice that affects how the SCOM MP or Azure Monitor health model is built
- Any decision that creates a constraint on Phases 3–6
- Any cross-track parity decision
- Any decision the next maintainer would otherwise have to re-litigate
Format¶
See template.md. Numbered sequentially, ZERO-padded to four digits. Filename is NNNN-kebab-case-title.md. Once an ADR is Accepted it is immutable — supersede it with a new ADR rather than editing it in place.
Workflow¶
- Open a PR adding the ADR with status
Proposed - Discuss and refine in PR review
- Merge with status
Acceptedonce consensus reached - If later overturned, write a successor ADR and mark this one
Superseded by ADR XXXX